Quantifiers And Context-Dependence
Year:
1995Published in:
AnalysisLet DDQ be the thesis that definite descriptions are quantifiers. Philoso-phers often deny DDQ because they believe that quantifiers do not depend on context in certain ways, ways in which definite descriptions do depend on context. In this paper, we examine one such argument, which, if sound, would entail the negation of DDQ. 1 We show that this argument fails, and draw some consequences from its failure. As is familiar, the truth of an utterance of a sentence containing a quan-tified expression must be evaluated with respect to a contextually determined domain.
Related by author
56 publications found
Rationality Is Gendered
Publisher: Collabra: Psychology
Authors: Jason Stanley, Yarrow Dunham, Olivia Pavco-Giaccia, Martha Fitch Little
How Propaganda Works
Publisher: Princeton University Press
Authors: Jason Stanley
We Disagree On A Lot Of Things. Except The Danger Of Anti‑Critical Race Theory Laws.
Publisher: International New York Times
Authors: Jason Stanley, David French, Kmele Foster, Thomas Chatterton Williams
How Fascism Works: The Politics Of Us And Them
Publisher: Random House
Authors: Jason Stanley
Teaching In The Time Of Trump
Publisher: Social Education
Authors: Jason Stanley, Benjamin Justice
The Politics Of Language
Publisher: Princeton University Press
Authors: Jason Stanley, David Beaver
Propaganda
Publisher: Routledge
Authors: Jason Stanley, Anne Quaranto
In Defense Of Truth, And The Threat Of Disinformation
Publisher: United States Advisory Commission
Authors: Jason Stanley
Toward A Non‑Ideal Philosophy Of Language
Publisher: Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal
Authors: Jason Stanley, David Beaver
When Free Speech Becomes A Political Weapon
Publisher: The Chronicle of Higher Education
Authors: Jason Stanley, Kate Manne