Quantifiers And Context-Dependence
Year:
1995Published in:
AnalysisLet DDQ be the thesis that definite descriptions are quantifiers. Philoso-phers often deny DDQ because they believe that quantifiers do not depend on context in certain ways, ways in which definite descriptions do depend on context. In this paper, we examine one such argument, which, if sound, would entail the negation of DDQ. 1 We show that this argument fails, and draw some consequences from its failure. As is familiar, the truth of an utterance of a sentence containing a quan-tified expression must be evaluated with respect to a contextually determined domain.
Related by author
56 publications found
Rationality Is Gendered
Publisher: Collabra: Psychology
Authors: Jason Stanley, Yarrow Dunham, Olivia Pavco-Giaccia, Martha Fitch Little
The Politics Of Language
Publisher: Princeton University Press
Authors: Jason Stanley, David Beaver
In Defense Of Truth, And The Threat Of Disinformation
Publisher: United States Advisory Commission
Authors: Jason Stanley
Raising Hell: On The Hyper‑Projectivity Of Slurs
Publisher: Amsterdam Colloquium
Authors: Jason Stanley, David Beaver
How Propaganda Works
Publisher: Princeton University Press
Authors: Jason Stanley
Propaganda
Publisher: Routledge
Authors: Jason Stanley, Anne Quaranto
When Free Speech Becomes A Political Weapon
Publisher: The Chronicle of Higher Education
Authors: Jason Stanley, Kate Manne
Buffalo Shooting: How White Replacement Theory Keeps Inspiring Mass Murder
Publisher: The Guardian
Authors: Jason Stanley
Skill
Publisher: Noûs
Authors: Jason Stanley, Timothy Williamson
Toward A Non‑Ideal Philosophy Of Language
Publisher: Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal
Authors: Jason Stanley, David Beaver