Raising Hell: On The Hyper-Projectivity Of Slurs
Year:
2022Published in:
Amsterdam ColloquiumMere mentions of a slur have the potential to do harm, assaulting a listener, perpetuating marginalization of oppressed groups, and solidifying oppressive practices. Whereas most projective meanings, such as presuppositions, are typically assumed to be blocked by quotation, some effects of slurs are found even when the slur is quoted. In this sense, slurs are hyper-projective. Our goal is to explain why. The material here is drawn from: David Beaver and Jason Stanley, The Politics of Language, Princeton University Press (in press), primarily from Chapter 10, “Oppressive Speech.”
Related by author
56 publications found
Propaganda
Publisher: Routledge
Authors: Jason Stanley, Anne Quaranto
The Politics Of Language
Publisher: Princeton University Press
Authors: Jason Stanley, David Beaver
Buffalo Shooting: How White Replacement Theory Keeps Inspiring Mass Murder
Publisher: The Guardian
Authors: Jason Stanley
Modality And What Is Said
Publisher: Philosophical Perspectives
Authors: Jason Stanley
Knowledge And Certainty
Publisher: Philosophical Issues
Authors: Jason Stanley
Rationality Is Gendered
Publisher: Collabra: Psychology
Authors: Jason Stanley, Yarrow Dunham, Olivia Pavco-Giaccia, Martha Fitch Little
Knowledge And Practical Interests
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Authors: Jason Stanley
When Free Speech Becomes A Political Weapon
Publisher: The Chronicle of Higher Education
Authors: Jason Stanley, Kate Manne
Quantifiers And Context‑Dependence
Publisher: Analysis
Authors: Jason Stanley, Timothy Williamson
Skill
Publisher: Noûs
Authors: Jason Stanley, Timothy Williamson